- WILL THE US GO ON TOTAL LOCKDOWN FOR FREE
- WILL THE US GO ON TOTAL LOCKDOWN HOW TO
- WILL THE US GO ON TOTAL LOCKDOWN FREE
“We’re saying we really do have to learn how to coexist with this virus in a way that doesn’t require constant closing down of economies, but at the same time in a way that is not associated with high levels of suffering and death,” Nabarro said in the interview. That context Nabarro mentioned covered a range of topics, such as the estimate that about 90% of the world’s population is still vulnerable to COVID-19, that lockdowns are only an effective pandemic response in extreme circumstances and what Nabarro means when he talks about finding the “middle path.” He responded, by email: “My comments were taken totally out of context. We checked with Nabarro to find out if the clip accurately reflected the points he raised during a nearly 20-minute interview. But by and large, we’d rather not do it.” Nabarro then went on to describe potential economic consequences, including effects on the tourism industry and farmers or the worsening of world poverty.
The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources protect your health workers who are exhausted. In response to a question about the economic consequences of lockdowns, Nabarro said: “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus.
The segment was televised by the British news outlet Spectator TV. David Nabarro, a special envoy on COVID-19 for the WHO, by Scottish journalist Andrew Neil. We reached out to the Trump campaign and the White House to ask for more information about Trump’s assertion but didn’t receive a response.Īlthough the Trump team didn’t get back to us, we noticed that the Trump War Room Twitter account responded to Trump’s tweet with a link to a video, appearing to back up the president’s claim. has never had an actual enforced lockdown like there have been in some Asian countries and in Italy last spring,” Nichols wrote in an email. The “definition has differed country by country and state by state. Yet those lockdowns - marked by stay-at-home orders and other restrictions - have been less stringent than those implemented in other countries, said Brooke Nichols, an assistant professor of global health at Boston University. And his administration largely delegated lockdown decisions to governors and local governments. in the early stages of the pandemic, however. He also took credit for locking down the U.S. Since May, Trump has been vocal about asking states to reopen businesses, schools, religious services and other social activities.
WILL THE US GO ON TOTAL LOCKDOWN FREE
Subscribe to KHN's free Morning Briefing. Together, the tweet and these comments got considerable attention on social media.īut did the WHO change its stance on lockdowns or concede anything to Trump, as he said it did? Briefly, no.
Suicide rates, drug rates, alcoholism, deaths by so many different forms. The lockdowns are doing tremendous damage to these Democrat-run states, where they’re locked out, sealed up. He reiterated his statement later that night during a campaign rally, saying, “But the World Health Organization, did you see what happened? They just came out a little while ago, and they admitted that Donald Trump was right. A long battle, but they finally did the right thing!” The cure cannot be worse than the problem itself. Lockdowns are killing countries all over the world. In a post on Twitter, Trump wrote: “The World Health Organization just admitted that I was right. On Monday, President Donald Trump claimed that the World Health Organization (WHO) “admitted” he was correct that using lockdowns to control the spread of COVID-19 was more damaging than the illness.
WILL THE US GO ON TOTAL LOCKDOWN FOR FREE
This story can be republished for free ( details). This story was produced in partnership with PolitiFact.
0 kommentar(er)
